<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en-US" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <link href="http://www.eco-villages.org/notes/atom/304" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"/>
  <link href="http://www.eco-villages.org/notes/view/304"/>
  <id>urn:memiki:edouard:culture:Books:The-End-of-Faith-Religion-Terror-and-the-Future-of-Reason:note-304</id>
  <title>The End of Faith - Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason</title>
  <updated>2009-05-31T14:32:31Z</updated>
  <entry>
    <id>urn:edouard:culture:Books:The-End-of-Faith-Religion-Terror-and-the-Future-of-Reason:note-304</id>
    <title>Note body</title>
    <author>
      <name>edouard</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2007-04-09T17:49:26Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_Harris_%28author%29">Sam Harris</a></p>


	<p><strong>In the shadow of weapons of mass destruction, we can no longer tolerate views that pit one true god against another.</strong><br />(I would add: any &#8220;total-itarian&#8221; world view, not just religion/theocracy; e.g. communism, fascism !)</p>


	<table>
		<tr>
			<td><img src="http://www.newsfromnowhere.org.uk/img/books/0743268091.jpg" alt="" /></td>
			<td><strong>Harris calls for an end to respect and tolerance for the competing belief systems of religion!</strong>, which he describes as being &#8220;all equally uncontaminated by evidence&#8221;.<br />He is equally critical of religious moderation: an accommodation that only blinds us to the real perils of fundamentalism.<br />Possibly the most controversial aspect of The End of Faith is an uncompromising assessment and criticism of Islam, which Harris describes as being a &#8220;cult of death&#8221; (backed up by numerous quotations from the Koran and survey results showing that significant percentages of Muslims would justify suicide bombing as a legitimate tactic).<br />He is also critical of moral relativism and leftist &#8211; &#8220;unreason&#8221; / paternalism / angelism &#8230;</td>
		</tr>
	</table>




	<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_End_of_Faith">wikipedia link</a></p>


	<p>&#8220;Politically incorect&#8221;, excessive?, impassioning, scary! A must read! But I don&#8217;t agree 100%; It&#8217;s not just religion that is/can be dangerous, I think it&#8217;s all strong &#8220;emotionally loaded&#8221; belief systems. Those systems (including religion, politics) are easily contaminated by unreason and totalitarism. The problem is that most humans like to blindingly follow simple ideas&#8230;</p>


	<p>Dans le meme style mais en Francais, lu aussi:<br /><a href="http://www.amazon.fr/religions-meurtri%C3%A8res-Elie-Barnavi/dp/2080690477/ref=sr_1_1/171-0641439-9693043?ie=UTF8&#38;s=books&#38;qid=1189453627&#38;sr=8-1"><strong>Les Religions Meurtrieres</strong></a></p>


	<p>Same topic, 2009 (by Christopher Hitchens):<br /><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_is_not_Great" title="the case against religion"><strong>God is not great</strong></a></p>      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
