<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en-US" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <link href="http://www.eco-villages.org/notes/atom/1257" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"/>
  <link href="http://www.eco-villages.org/notes/view/1257"/>
  <id>urn:memiki:edouard:science-technology:Audio-and-Video:Best-HD-TVs-:note-1257</id>
  <title>Best HD TVs?</title>
  <updated>2010-05-18T11:15:54Z</updated>
  <entry>
    <id>urn:edouard:science-technology:Audio-and-Video:Best-HD-TVs-:note-1257</id>
    <title>Note body</title>
    <author>
      <name>edouard</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2008-05-30T14:54:20Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<h2>Technology</h2>


	<p>Obviously <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_LED"><span class="caps">OLED</span></a> will be great, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface-conduction_electron-emitter_display"><span class="caps">SED</span></a> &#8217;s dead (kind of), what&#8217;s available now for large and flat screens: <span class="caps">LCD</span> (LED backlit or not) or Plasma.<br />LCDs (especially the fanciest newest ones) have this ugly &#8220;hand held video like&#8221; look / <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/08/12/help-key-why-hd-video-looks-weird/">soap opera effect</a> that makes a great movie (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/24p">24p</a> dvd or bluray) looks like a &#8220;love boat&#8221; episode! (it&#8217;s even funny: some people think it&#8217;s the HD effect/ feel / &#8220;too real&#8221;! no, it&#8217;s not: it&#8217;s just ugly. turning off frame interpolation with 120/240Hz is not enough, the gamma also looks bad, no brightness details etc&#8230;) which leave them good only for watching tv or playing games. Therefore to watch movies the only available decent screen <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_display_technology">display technology</a> is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_display">plama</a> with deep blacks and (real) high micro-contrast; any sane videophile will chose plasma over lcd.</p>


	<h2>Best Plasmas: ... used to be Pionneer Kuro Plasma</h2>


	<p><a href="http://www.hometheatermag.com/plasmadisplays/907kuro/index.html">review at hometheatermag.com</a></p>


	<p><img src="http://www.hometheatermag.com/images/archivesart/907kuro1.jpg" alt="" /></p>


<blockquote>
	<p>It&#8217;s not just the fact that the <span class="caps">PRO</span>-110FD creates a beautiful image. It&#8217;s that the image it creates is such a step above every other flat panel on the market that it is not even comparable.</p>

</blockquote>




	<p><a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/05/07/second-generation-pioneer-kuro-unveiled-5x-deeper-black-levels/">Second-generation Pioneer <span class="caps">KURO</span></a></p>


<blockquote>
	<p>The 2008 <span class="caps">KURO</span> family will posses black levels &#8220;five times deeper than the previous <span class="caps">KURO</span></p>

</blockquote>




<blockquote>
	<p>You can count on the June-bound models checking in at just 3.7-inches thick, sporting 1080p panels alone (no 720p), coming in 50- ($4,000) / 60-inch ($5,500) sizes</p>

</blockquote>




	<p><em>Note</em>: Panasonic plasma seem to get good review too:<br /><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/panasonics-th-50pz700u-plasma-becomes-best-ever-tested/">Panasonic TH-50PZ700U</a></p>


	<p><a href="http://hdguru.com/panasonic-th-50pz850u-exclusive-hd-guru%E2%84%A2-first-review/249/">Panasonic <strong>TH-50PZ850U</strong> against kuro</a></p>


<blockquote>
	<p>Basically, while Kuro is blacker (courtesy of its screen&#8217;s darker tint) and brighter, Panny&#8217;s color reproduction is much deeper, you get better dark detail, more accurate gamma, it uses 30 percent less power, <span class="caps">AND</span> it&#8217;s cheaper ($3500 to $4600).</p>

</blockquote>




	<p>Anyway panasonic will be producing future Kuro panels!...<br /><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/24/pioneer-panasonic-reach-basic-agreement-on-kuro-production-fir/">Pioneer &#8211; Panasonic agreement</a></p>


	<p>2009 update: Kuros are dead!<br />latest panasonic seems to be &#8220;almost&#8221; as good</p>


	<h2>2009 best</h2>


	<p><a href="http://hdguru.com/the-new-king-of-hdtv-displays-panasonics-tc-p54v10-reviewed/458/">new king of hdtv <strong><span class="caps">P54V10</span></strong></a><br />Deep blacks, shadow details, color accuracy (with <span class="caps">THX</span> mode) etc&#8230; <br />Lighter (33kg!) than old plasmas and ~thin (3.3 inches, 2 on top), more power efficient than older plasmas (280w!).</p>


	<p><img src="http://hdguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/tc-54pv10_415.jpg" alt="" /></p>


	<p><em>(I bought a TX-P50V10E dec 2009)</em></p>


	<h2>2010</h2>


	<p><strong>Panasonic</strong> (upper models): 5000000:1 dynamic range = <a href="http://hd.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/">better black levels</a><br />+ 3D for VT models (nice if it were without glasses!)</p>


	<p><a href="http://hdguru.com/panasonic-tc-p50vt20-3d-hdtv-hd-guru-exclusive-first-review/1391/"><span class="caps">P50VT20</span> at hdguru</a></p>


<blockquote>
	<p>The improved scan and phosphors along with the deep blacks and accurate color provided excellent image reproduction and fine shadow detail. These improvements add up to amazing overall images free of the “video look” associated with 120 and 240 Hz <span class="caps">LED</span> LCDs.</p>

</blockquote>




	<p><a href="http://www.panasonic.ch/fr/Produits/Produits+Grand+Public/T%E9l%E9viseurs+%E9cran+plat/Pr%E9sentation+VIERA/T%E9l%E9viseurs+VIERA+Plasma/Diagonale+110+-+130+cm/001009001001002/TX-P50V20E/description.html">2D model TX-P50V20E (Switzerland)</a></p>      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>

